Current:Home > MyFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -MoneyStream
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-16 07:12:09
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (9596)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- IndyCar finalizes charter system that doesn’t guarantee spots in Indianapolis 500
- In cruel twist of fate, Martin Truex Jr. eliminated from NASCAR playoffs after speeding
- Chiefs show their flaws – and why they should still be feared
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Is Teen Mom Alum Kailyn Lowry Truly Done Having Kids After 7? She Says…
- Eek: Detroit-area library shuts down after a DVD is returned with bugs inside
- MLB playoffs home-field advantage is overrated. Why 'road can be a beautiful place'
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Banned Books Week starts with mixed messages as reports show challenges both up and down
Ranking
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Before you sign up for a store credit card, know what you’re getting into
- Kate Middleton Makes First Appearance Since Announcing End of Chemotherapy
- Jalen Carter beefs with Saints fans, is restrained by Nick Sirianni after Eagles win
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- These Secrets About The West Wing Are What's Next
- What game is Tom Brady broadcasting in Week 3? Where to listen to Fox NFL analyst
- Lucius Bainbridge: From Investment Genius to Philanthropist
Recommendation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
The Fed sees its inflation fight as a success. Will the public eventually agree?
Climbing car sales, more repos: What's driving our 'wacky' auto economy
Sister Wives' Janelle Brown Says Kody Brown and Robyn Brown Owe Her Money, Threatens Legal Action
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
MLB playoffs home-field advantage is overrated. Why 'road can be a beautiful place'
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy visits Pennsylvania ammunition factory to thank workers
Josh Gad opens up about anxiety, 'Frozen' and new children's book 'PictureFace Lizzy'