Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -MoneyStream
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:53:51
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- 3-year-old boy shot dead while in car with his mom
- Dozens dead after blast in southwestern Pakistan at a rally celebrating birthday of Islam’s prophet
- Former Colorado fugitive sentenced to prison for spectacular Caesars Palace standoff in Vegas
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- 'What Not to Wear' co-hosts Stacy London, Clinton Kelly reunite after 10-year feud
- The fall of an enclave in Azerbaijan stuns the Armenian diaspora, extinguishing a dream
- A college degree can boost your pay — but so can your alma mater. Here are top colleges for income.
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- AP Week in Pictures: Asia
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Best and worst performances after a memorable first month of the college football season
- Inaugural People's Choice Country Awards hosted by Little Big Town: How to watch, who's nominated?
- AP Week in Pictures: Global | Sept. 8-14, 2023
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- 'Golden Bachelor' premiere recap: Gerry Turner brings the smooches, unbridled joy and drama
- Indiana governor breaks ground on $1.2 billion state prison that will replace 2 others
- First Floods, Now Fires: How Neglect and Fraud Hobbled an Alabama Town
Recommendation
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
Before senior aide to Pennsylvania governor resigned, coworker accused adviser of sexual harassment
Former lawmaker who led Michigan marijuana board is sent to prison for bribery
Before senior aide to Pennsylvania governor resigned, coworker accused adviser of sexual harassment
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Travis Kelce Reacts After Mark Cuban Tells Taylor Swift to Break Up With the NFL Star
A Spanish court rejects appeal to reopen the investigation into tycoon John McAfee’s jail cell death
Texas death row inmate with 40-year mental illness history ruled not competent to be executed