Current:Home > InvestWhat to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next -MoneyStream
What to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next
View
Date:2025-04-12 10:28:41
Washington — An unprecedented ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court that bans former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 ballot is unlikely to be the final word on the matter.
The court put its ruling on hold until Jan. 4, anticipating that Trump would appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, setting up a showdown to decide whether the Republican presidential front-runner can remain in the race just as primaries begin in early states.
What did the ruling say?
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that former President Trump is disqualified from holding the presidency under the Constitution's so-called insurrection clause. But the issue divided the seven justices — all of whom were appointed by Democratic governors.
"President Trump did not merely incite the insurrection," the court wrote in the 4-to-3 ruling. "Even when the siege on the Capitol was fully underway, he continued to support it by repeatedly demanding that Vice President [Mike] Pence refuse to perform his constitutional duty and by calling Senators to persuade them to stop the counting of electoral votes. These actions constituted overt, voluntary, and direct participation in the insurrection."
The court issued several findings in its decision, including:
- The Jan. 6, 2021, riot was an an insurrection
- Trump "engaged in" an insurrection
- Trump's speech "inciting the crowd" before the riot was "not protected by the First Amendment"
- Colorado law allows voters to challenge Trump's eligibility under the insurrectionist clause
- The clause can be enforced without action from Congress
- The clause applies to the presidency
Can Trump appeal?
The Trump campaign called the decision "completely flawed" and said it will "swiftly" appeal the ruling.
"We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor," Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement.
David Becker, CBS News election law contributor, said it's not mandatory that the Supreme Court take this case, but "it's almost a 100% likelihood that they will take on this case."
What is the insurrection clause?
The Constitution's insurrection clause — Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — has been used to challenge Trump's eligibility for the ballot in several states.
The provision seeks to prevent those who swore an oath to support the Constitution but "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. from holding state or federal office. It originally sought to keep former Confederate civil and military officeholders from serving in government and has rarely been used in modern times. The Colorado Supreme Court's decision is the first time it's been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
Does it apply to other states?
Anti-Trump plaintiffs have brought the insurrectionist clause argument to keep Trump off the ballot to courts in several states.
The Colorado ruling does not apply to other states, though it could embolden others to take action. Colorado, which leans Democrat, is not a competitive state for Trump in the general election. However, if Trump were to be disqualified from the ballot in a swing state, it would put Republicans at a massive disadvantage.
The Colorado ruling stands in contrast with several recent legal decisions on the matter.
Last month, a Minnesota Supreme Court decision said the state party can put anyone on its primary ballot. But the court said petitioners could try again in the context of the general election.
In Michigan, the court of appeals decided just last week that it won't stop Trump from appearing on the state's 2024 Republican primary ballot. The court affirmed two lower court rulings, without determining whether the insurrection clause applied to Trump.
"Who to place on the primary ballot is determined by the political parties and the individual candidates," the appeals court said in a 3-0 opinion, citing Michigan law.
- In:
- Colorado
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Donald Trump
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at cbsnews.com and is based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.
TwitterveryGood! (6)
Related
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- 5 women, 1 man shot during Los Angeles drive-by shooting; 3 suspects at large
- Tech tips to turn yourself into a Google Workspace and Microsoft Office pro
- California fire agency employee charged with arson spent months as inmate firefighter
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Nikki Garcia's Ex Artem Chigvintsev Shares His Priority After Extremely Difficult Legal Battle
- Simone Biles Wants Her Athleta Collection to Make Women Feel Confident & Powerful
- Simone Biles Wants Her Athleta Collection to Make Women Feel Confident & Powerful
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Hoda Kotb says she is leaving NBC’s ‘Today’ show early next year
Ranking
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Home cookin': Diners skipping restaurants and making more meals at home as inflation trend inverts
- Oklahoma set to execute Emmanuel Littlejohn in beloved store owner's murder. What to know
- Opinion: Pac-12 revival deserves nickname worthy of cheap sunglasses
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- California fire agency employee charged with arson spent months as inmate firefighter
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Showerheads
- Utah Supreme Court to decide viability of a ballot question deemed ‘counterfactual’ by lower court
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Kentucky sheriff accused of killing judge in Letcher County pleads not guilty
Northern lights forecast: Aurora borealis may appear in multiple US states, NOAA says
Utah Supreme Court to decide viability of a ballot question deemed ‘counterfactual’ by lower court
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
How New York City Is Getting Screwed Out of $4.2 Billion in State Green Bonds
Sean “Diddy” Combs’ Attorney Says He’s “Very Eager” to Testify in Upcoming Trial
'Extreme Makeover: Home Edition' star Eduardo Xol dies at 58 after apparent stabbing