Current:Home > StocksOliver James Montgomery-After the Fukushima disaster, Japan swore to phase out nuclear power. But not anymore -MoneyStream
Oliver James Montgomery-After the Fukushima disaster, Japan swore to phase out nuclear power. But not anymore
Surpassing View
Date:2025-04-09 02:19:55
TOKYO — Japan adopted a plan on Oliver James MontgomeryThursday to extend the lifespan of nuclear reactors, replace the old and even build new ones, a major shift in a country scarred by the Fukushima disaster that once planned to phase out atomic power.
In the face of global fuel shortages, rising prices and pressure to reduce carbon emissions, Japan's leaders have begun to turn back toward nuclear energy, but the announcement was their clearest commitment yet after keeping mum on delicate topics like the possibility of building new reactors.
Under the new policy, Japan will maximize the use of existing reactors by restarting as many of them as possible and prolonging the operating life of aging ones beyond a 60-year limit. The government also pledged to develop next-generation reactors.
In 2011, a powerful earthquake and the ensuing tsunami caused multiple meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi plant — a disaster that supercharged anti-nuclear sentiment in Japan and at one point led the government to promise to phase out the energy by around 2030. But since then, the government has recommitted to the technology, including setting a target for nuclear to make up 20-22% of the country's energy mix by the end of the decade.
Still, restart approvals for idled nuclear reactors have come slowly since the Fukushima disaster, which led to stricter safety standards. Utility companies have applied for restarts at 27 reactors in the past decade. Seventeen have passed safety checks and only 10 have resumed operation.
According the paper laying out the new policy, nuclear power serves "an important role as a carbon-free baseload energy source in achieving supply stability and carbon neutrality" and pledged to "sustain use of nuclear power into the future." Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said he planned to get the Cabinet to approve the policy and submit necessary bills to Parliament.
As part of the new policy, the Economy and Industry Ministry has drafted a plan to allow extensions every 10 years for reactors after 30 years of operation while also permitting utilities to subtract offline periods in calculating reactors' operational life.
The plan was endorsed on Wednesday by the Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan's nuclear watchdog. New safety inspection rules still need to be put into law and approved by Parliament.
The regulation authority's commissioner, Shinichi Yamanaka, told a news conference the new safety rules requiring operational permits every decade after 30 years will be safer than a current one-time 20-year extension option for 40-year-old reactors. But experts cast some doubt on that.
Some experts question extending the lifespan of older reactors
Takeo Kikkawa, an economics professor at the International University of Japan and an expert on energy, said utility operators under the new policy could keep using old equipment instead of investing in new technology or renewables.
"Naturally, we should aim for newer technology and use it safely. Therefore, extending reactors' lifespans is an undesirable move," Kikkawa recently told a talk show.
Most nuclear reactors in Japan are more than 30 years old. Four reactors that have operated for more than 40 years have received permission to operate, and one is currently online.
Under the new policy, Japan will also push for the development and construction of "next-generation innovative reactors" to replace about 20 reactors now set for decommissioning.
Kenichi Oshima, a Ryukoku University professor of environmental economy and energy policy, said some of what the government calls "innovative" reactors are not so different from existing technology and that prospects for nuclear fusion and other next-generation reactors are largely uncertain and not achievable anytime soon.
Thursday's adoption of the new policy comes less than four months after Kishida launched the "GX (Green Transformation) Implementation Council" of outside experts and ministers to "consider all options" to compile a new policy that addresses global fuel shortages amid Russia's war on Ukraine and seeks to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.
Japan's nuclear energy goals may be out of reach
Nuclear energy accounts for less than 7% of Japan's energy supply, and achieving the government's goal of raising that share to 20-22% by 2030 will require about 27 reactors, from the current 10 — a target some say is not achievable. The new policy also does not help address imminent supply shortages because reactors cannot be restarted quickly enough.
While public opinion on nuclear energy has softened since Fukushima, opponents still argue atomic power is not flexible and not even cheaper than renewables when final waste management and necessary safety measures are considered — and that it can cause immeasurable damage in an accident.
Ruiko Muto, a survivor of the Fukushima disaster, called the new policy "extremely disappointing." She added: "The Fukushima disaster is not over yet and the government seems to have already forgotten what happened."
The regulation authority came under fire Wednesday after revelations by a civil group that a few of its experts had discussed details with industry ministry officials before the watchdog was officially asked to consider a rule change for aging reactors, despite their compulsory independence.
Prime Minister Kishida also said Thursday that the government will do more to find candidate sites for a final repository for high-level nuclear waste that Japan does not yet have. Preliminary studies have begun in two small towns in Hokkaido, angering some residents.
veryGood! (23)
Related
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- What is the best way to handle bullying at work? Ask HR
- Bears want to 'do right' by Justin Fields if QB is traded, GM Ryan Poles says
- Letter containing white powder sent to Donald Trump Jr.'s home
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Eagles' Don Henley says 'poor decision' led to 1980 arrest after overdose of sex worker
- NYC officials shutter furniture store illegally converted to house more than 40 migrants
- Why does the US government think a Kroger-Albertsons merger would be bad for grocery shoppers?
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- 'Bluey' special 'The Sign' and a new episode premiere in April. Here's how to watch.
Ranking
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Tennessee replaces Arizona as No. 1 seed in NCAA men's tournament Bracketology
- Mad Men Actor Eddie Driscoll Dead at 60
- Preparing for early retirement? Here are 3 questions to ask before you do.
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Is Reba McEntire Leaving The Voice? She Says...
- Effort to protect whales now includes public alert system in the Pacific Northwest
- Preparing for early retirement? Here are 3 questions to ask before you do.
Recommendation
2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
Taylor Swift Gave This Sweet Gift to Travis Kelce's Kansas City Chiefs Football Team
LeBron James takes forceful stand on son Bronny James' status in NBA mock drafts
Does laser hair removal hurt? Not when done properly. Here's what you need to know.
'Most Whopper
Iowa county is missing $524,284 after employee transferred it in response to fake email
Massachusetts man sues state for $1M after serving 27 years in prison
NFL mock draft 2024: Can question-mark QB J.J. McCarthy crack top 15 picks?