Current:Home > ContactSouth Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech -MoneyStream
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
View
Date:2025-04-18 00:43:39
SEOUL, Dec 12 - South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol's switch from contrition to defiance on Thursday (Dec 11) over his martial law order rallied some supporters but other members of his party said it did nothing to sway their view that he must be removed from office.
In a speech before a second impeachment vote scheduled for Saturday, Yoon condemned his political opponents as "anti-state forces" that side with enemies in North Korea, said Pyongyang may have hacked the South's elections and defended last week's short-lived martial law order as a legal move to protect democracy.
The remarks hit many of the talking points featuring on conservative YouTube channels and marked a sharp change of tone from a speech before the first impeachment vote last week in which he apologised and said he would place his political future in the hands of his People Power Party.
It was unclear what caused the change but Yoon gave no sign of supporting a proposal by PPP leader Han Dong-hoon for him to resign in coming months and to hand authority to the prime minister and ruling party until then.
The speech brought to the fore divisions in the PPP. Changing tack, Han urged party members to vote for impeachment on Saturday, a move greeted by shouting from pro-Yoon lawmakers, who voted in Kweon Seong-dong as their new party floor leader shortly after Yoon's speech.
[[nid:712402]]
Kweon, a Yoon supporter, said the party's position was still to oppose the president's impeachment but that a meeting would be held before Saturday's vote to finalise plans.
The party boycotted the last vote, preventing a quorum. At least 200 votes are needed to impeach Yoon. Opposition parties have 192 seats, so they need at least eight PPP members to join.
As of Thursday, at least seven members of the party were expected to support a new impeachment motion.
One PPP lawmaker who said he would now vote to impeach Yoon said the president's new remarks may have rallied some loyalists but sowed more confusion and division among conservatives.
[[nid:712337]]
"His speech had an impact on the election of the floor leader. Also, it sounds like he urged those who blindly follow the president among conservatives to take action," PPP lawmaker Kim Sang-wook told reporters.
Kim said he felt frustrated and betrayed because the speech dashed his last hopes that Yoon would leave office in a "decent" way.
Public support for impeachment
Opinion polls show a majority of South Koreans support impeaching Yoon. A survey released by pollster Realmeter on Dec. 5 found 73.6 per cent of respondents supported impeachment, including 50.4 per cent of those who identified themselves as conservatives.
Yoon's speech lit up conservative political forums online, with the top-ranked posts titled "Martial law was the most reasonable decision", and "Han made a wrong decision".
After Yoon's speech, scuffles could be seen breaking out between attendees of a pro-conservative rally in central Seoul and an opposition supporter who removed a banner of support for Yoon's martial law declaration.
Kim Tae-hyun, who attended the rally, said he thought Yoon did a "good job" with his speech and had the right to declare martial law.
"And the impeachment just shouldn't happen... So (the martial law declaration) was merely an expression of the authority of the president," said Kim. "The Democratic Party, which is currently holding the country back, is the real issue."
[[nid:712404]]
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (669)
Related
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- After Back-to-Back Hurricanes, North Carolina Reconsiders Climate Change
- Amazon Web Services outage leads to some sites going dark
- It’s ‘Going to End with Me’: The Fate of Gulf Fisheries in a Warming World
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Standing Rock Leaders Tell Dakota Pipeline Protesters to Leave Protest Camp
- 25 people in Florida are charged with a scheme to get fake nursing diplomas
- World’s Oceans Are Warming Faster, Studies Show, Fueling Storms and Sea Rise
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Save 69% On This Overnight Bag That’s Perfect for Summer Travel
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The Top Moisturizers for Oily Skin: SkinMedica, Neutrogena, La Roche-Posay and More
- Kayaker in Washington's Olympic National Park presumed dead after fiancee tries in vain to save him
- This Amazingly Flattering Halter Dress From Amazon Won Over 10,600+ Reviewers
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Wegovy works. But here's what happens if you can't afford to keep taking the drug
- Nursing home owners drained cash while residents deteriorated, state filings suggest
- Global Commission Calls for a Food Revolution to Solve World’s Climate & Nutrition Problems
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Harry Jowsey Reacts to Ex Francesca Farago's Engagement to Jesse Sullivan
U.S. Taxpayers on the Hook for Insuring Farmers Against Growing Climate Risks
The FDA considers a major shift in the nation's COVID vaccine strategy
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
When is it OK to make germs worse in a lab? It's a more relevant question than ever
6 doctors swallowed Lego heads for science. Here's what came out
Farm Bureau Warily Concedes on Climate, But Members Praise Trump’s Deregulation