Current:Home > reviewsOhio law banning nearly all abortions now invalid after referendum, attorney general says -MoneyStream
Ohio law banning nearly all abortions now invalid after referendum, attorney general says
View
Date:2025-04-14 15:35:03
A 2019 law banning most abortions in Ohio is unconstitutional following an abortion referendum last year, the state’s Republican attorney general said in a court filing Monday.
The filing comes after abortion clinics asked a Hamilton County judge to throw out the law since Ohio voters decided to enshrine abortion rights in the state constitution last November.
They argue that under the new constitutional amendment, the law, which bans most abortions once fetal cardiac activity can be detected, is invalid. Attorney General Dave Yost, for the most part, agreed.
However, the attorney general asked the court to only strike down the “core prohibition” of the law — banning abortions after six weeks — and let other portions remain. These include requiring a doctor to check for a heartbeat and inform a patient, as well as documenting the reason someone is having an abortion. Yost said in the filing that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated how such provisions violate the constitutional amendment.
The state “respects the will of the people,” a spokesperson for Yost’s office said in an email, but is also obligated to prevent overreach and protect parts of the law the amendment doesn’t address.
Freda Levenson, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, called the continued litigation “quibbling about extraneous matters” in an emailed statement, and disagreed that such issues have ever been a problem before in this case.
“This case should be over. Stick a fork in it,” she said in the statement.
The law signed by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine in April 2019 prohibited most abortions after the first detectable “fetal heartbeat.” Cardiac activity can be detected as early as six weeks into pregnancy, before many women know they are pregnant.
The ban, initially blocked through a federal legal challenge, briefly went into effect when the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision was overturned in 2022. It was then placed back on hold in county court, as part of a subsequent lawsuit challenging it as unconstitutional under the Ohio Constitution, eventually reaching the state Supreme Court.
In December 2023, the state’s highest court dismissed an appeal brought by Yost’s office " due to a change in the law.” This sent the case back to the lower courts, where it now resides.
The case now awaits a decision by Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Christian Jenkins.
___
Samantha Hendrickson is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
veryGood! (92152)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Rental application fees add up fast in a tight market. But limiting them is tough
- Deer spread COVID to humans multiple times, new research suggests
- Untangling Exactly What Happened to Pregnant Olympian Tori Bowie
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Warming Trends: Bugs Get Counted, Meteorologists on Call and Boats That Gather Data in the Hurricane’s Eye
- Judge overseeing Trump documents case agrees to push first pretrial conference
- This 22-year-old is trying to save us from ChatGPT before it changes writing forever
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Forests of the Living Dead
Ranking
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Over 100 Nations at COP26 Pledge to Cut Global Methane Emissions by 30 Percent in Less Than a Decade
- New York City nurses end strike after reaching a tentative agreement
- These 35 Belt Bags Under $35 Look So Much More Expensive Than They Actually Are
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- These 35 Belt Bags Under $35 Look So Much More Expensive Than They Actually Are
- This AI expert has 90 days to find a job — or leave the U.S.
- At buzzy health care business conference, investors fear the bubble will burst
Recommendation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Having Rolled Back Obama’s Centerpiece Climate Plan, Trump Defends a Vastly More Limited Approach
Kim Kardashian Reacts to Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker’s Baby News
Eminent Domain Lets Pipeline Developers Take Land, Pay Little, Say Black Property Owners
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Why the Poor in Baltimore Face Such Crushing ‘Energy Burdens’
Unsolved Mysteries: How Kayla Unbehaun's Abduction Case Ended With Her Mother's Arrest
Warming Trends: Stories of a Warming Sea, Spotless Dragonflies and Bad News for Shark Week